Similar Posts

| |

“Amateur-Made Stuff” Not Industry. Hollywood Should Dictate Video Models.

ByNalts

Revver’s recent change raises questions about the sustainability of amateur-created content, and whether Hollywood should be “dictating business models.” In a recent CNET article titled “YouTube Rivals Look for Answers,” Greg Sandoval reported that Revver co-founder Oliver Luckett and Revver’s Chief Technology Officer Rob Maigret have left Revver and are working together on a video project. The article…

| | | | | | |

Finding the Right Online Video Site for Your Needs

ByNalts

I wrote this article for The Daily Reel about finding the right online video site — whether you’re after fame, fortune or friends. Contrary to popular belief, YouTube isn’t the definitive video-sharing site for everyone. Knowing what you want is the first step in figuring out where to share. When it comes to sharing videos…

| | | | | | | |

Extra, Extra: Google Video Preparing to Share Ad Revenue With Video Creators

ByNalts

Google Video is rolling out some new features, including “instant gratification” uploading, and the ability to add comments, tags and ratings. Buried quietly in the “terms and conditions” (which you default accept if you don’t opt out in 5 days) is some language that suggests Google Video is preparing to give amateurs the ability to…

| | | | | |

Revenue-Sharing Video Sites: Revver vs MotionTV vs Eefoof

ByNalts

This blog was originally founded as a way to help amateur “online video creators” make cash. It’s drifted into a review of the online video industry, advertising implications, and even a source for current popular online viral videos. For this post let’s get back to our roots.  Through the sweat, blood and tears of MarquisdeJolie…

| | | | | | | | | | |

Online Video Sites and Monetization Status

ByNalts

TubeMogul’s blog did a nice summary of the online-video sites it feeds, and provides user feedback about the site and monetization status (whether you can make money on the sites). You can also read the “Zagat’s”-like report as a PDF. Thanks to Mark from TubeMogul for bringing this to our attention.

5 Comments

  3. Revver 1.1 sounds nice,but it will still be the pay per click model.I emailed sean boyd(member services coordinator at revver),he said to “look for pay per impression in a couple of months,and that 1.1 will take a fair amount of testing”.At least they are moving in the right direction! * P.S. I just made my first .12 cents on Blip.tv!! Except its still pending,i guess it takes some extra financing to deal out that kind of cash? good luck all, Steve :-O

  5. The new widget builder is definitely helpful, and I like the look of the site a lot more. Even though it’s not every thing I would like it to be it’s well on its way.

Comments are closed.