| | | | | | | |

Marquisdejolie Reviews Pay-For-Content Sites

ByNalts

One of the highest productivity video creators is also the most experimental with various sites and blogs to promote his work. Here’s his comment about some of the pay-for-content sites. To see his blog, click on the link on the right (I have a perpetually link to his video blog.

Revver is king. I’ve made a couple of thousand dollars from it even though it did make me do all the promoting.

Panjea’s damned Flash rips my QuickTime files to shreds. I’m really starting to hate Flash sites.

LuLu wants me to PAY $15 a month to upload on the off chance that I make make $10? That’s Hillbilly math.

eefoof has no embeddable code. How can you have your pudding if you don’t eat your meat? I mean, how am I supposed to promote my videos if I can’t shop them around? And again, WTF is this with the “Does Not Claim Ownership” category?

Similar Posts

The Onion Lampoons Viral. Tide Runs With It.

ByNalts

Last week, The Onion ran a wonderfully fictitious article by “Fred Hammond, Director of Digital Video and Social-Media Ad Integration, Tide Detergent.” Onion, you had me at hello. The desperately hipster editorial promotes his own low-involvement brand, and all of the cool (yet faux) social-media programs that try to engage Tide customers. Clearly Fred has read…

Media Covers YouTube “Cracking Down” With “Placement Police”

ByNalts

MediaWeek wrote about the YouTube Placement police, and the NY Times picked it up. Seems YouTube isn’t crazy about being shut out of revenue when an adertiser and partner work directly. It’s a nice, balanced article (and I’m quoted in it, so of course I’ve got to blog about it). But I found one part interesting:…