Category Archives: Google

What Will YouTube Do When Paris Hilton Doesn’t Save Them?

paris-on-youtube.jpgTechCrunch’s Marshall Kirpatrick reports that YouTube tomorrow will unveil a number of branded commercial channels– including a Paris Hilton channel being featured on the homepage. This is a surprising and encouraging move from a video site that hasn’t shown any other interesting way to profit from its incredible appeal. Fox has paid an undisclosed sum to advertise on YouTube and build custom channels, and it appears other media players (like NBC) are starting to take YouTube seriously.

So what’s next?

First, YouTube will have to figure out how to keep viewers at YouTube.com. The networks, despite what they’re telling YouTube right now, will constantly fight to dissintermediate YouTube. That way they can evolve past promoting their own shows… and start selling advertising space around their online content. Can you imagine how hard it will be for Fox to split ad revenue with YouTube when the ads surround Fox content? Sooner or later Fox will say- “why do I need you, tube?”

Second, we’ll probably see some fee-base channels evolve. I don’t see a sustainable pay-for-view model with YouTube alone, but if it partners well it could move that direction. Then Paris can charge for her nude videos… oh, wait… too late.

Third (and most importantly) what does it mean to us amateur video folks? Like Google Video, YouTube is focusing on large advertising deals with major content providers. Our viral stuff isn’t where the real action is yet. But here’s the good news (this is still me talking, but I’m drop quoting for emphasis):

YouTube needs to maintain “consumer generated content” to keep people returning to the site and avoid being dissintermediated by large content owners (Disney, Fox, Time Warner). Beyond some cool functionality and traffic (which is fickle), the amateur video content is the only edge YouTube has over Big Media.

So I would suspect YouTube is going to start sharing ad revenue with select creators that have Director accounts. The content will have more rigorous screening process (to ensure people don’t make ad revenue from video clips they ripped from the Daily Show), and will be vetted to ensure the content won’t embarass an advertiser. YouTube can start with me. I’m seeing WireFly ads on my little user page. How about a little CPC sharing?

Stay tuned. It’s getting more interesting by the day.

Another Ranking of Top 10 Video Sites

Here’s another ranking of top video sites (by LightReading.com). I’m reminded that it’s probably time for me to update my ranking of the top revenue-sharings sites.

I admire LightReading’s thorough review, but I’m surprised that it overlooked the fundamental differences in business models between these sites. I suppose LightReading is an infrastructure site that is looking at it from that angle, but it does get down to comparing user experience and functionality.

However how can you review online video sites and not talk about the advertising models and whether you can make money by submitting… or not?

  1. Here’s the “cheat sheet.”
  2. Here’s a deeper dive on criteria for the cheat sheet.
  3. Here are the specific reviews for LightReading’s favorites.

    Blip.tv
    VideoEgg
    Dailymotion
    YouTube
    Veoh
    Google Video
    Grouper
    Jumpcut
    AOL
    Eyespot

Google XXX

Techcrunch discovers that Google Video may be moving into the adult video arena. Yipes.

“People watching Google Video closely noticed a change this week in the upload area – the restrictions on uploading “pornographic or obscene” material is now just a restriction on “obscene” material. They’ve also added a “mature and adult” category to the genres and removed (I believe) a box on the initial uploading page that must be checked where the uploader certifies that the “video is not pornographic or obscene material”.

This may or may not mean Google is allowing, or preparing to allow, porn. Videos containing nudity are clearly available on the site, and many were uploaded months ago (for example, is this porn?). But nothing hardcore seems to be on the site.”

By the way… at the time of this writing 8 out of the top 10 Google Videos are sex related.

Extra, Extra: Google Video Preparing to Share Ad Revenue With Video Creators

personal_google_video.gifGoogle Video is rolling out some new features, including “instant gratification” uploading, and the ability to add comments, tags and ratings. Buried quietly in the “terms and conditions” (which you default accept if you don’t opt out in 5 days) is some language that suggests Google Video is preparing to give amateurs the ability to profit from ad revenue and sales of videos. See “more” below for an e-mail that was sent to uploaders last night. To read the new “terms and conditions” click here.

Highlights:

  • Selling Videos for 70% Gross: If user-generated video is eventually sold or rented via Google video, Google keeps 30%.
  • Ad Sharing Hints: If Google Video does share advertising revenue, you need to accrue $100 before they pay you, and it’s paid monthly.
  • You’re Fired: They can terminate your account if you set up more than one – unless you get written permission. If you provide a link from your video and don’t update it, they can terminate you.
  • Boilerplate Content Language: You grant a royalty-free, non-exclusive right. You allow Google Video to display “limited excerpts” of your content for “no fee to the end user.” You have to indemnify Google and only submit content that you create.
  • You’re Giving it to Google and Any of Google’s Friends: You give Google Video the right to display the video content “in connection with Google products and services now existing or hereafter developed, including without limitation for syndication on third party sites.” You are giving grant Google a non-exclusive, world-wide, royalty-free license to use your name and logo in connection with your video.
  • Click Fraud Clause: Google wouldn’t pay you for clicks “co-mingled” with invalid clicks. Suppose that means if they find Clickfraud, they don’t want to have to weed out the real from the fake.
  • Hush Clause: You can’t disclose your click thru rates. That’s Google confidential.

Bottom line? This represents Google Video moving slightly into YouTube’s “community” space for consumer-generated content, and potentially into Revver and Eefoof‘s advertising-sharing model. However I wouldn’t see it initially as a high-profit source for amateurs. Google Video appears to prioritize major content providers, and I’d predict the bulk of revenue to come from low-margin contextual ads. Although Google has high traffic, it needs to get into display/impression advertising to make decent money in the online video arena. Continue reading Extra, Extra: Google Video Preparing to Share Ad Revenue With Video Creators

Google, Ads and Distribution! “No One’s Ever Done This Before.”

lightbulb.jpgAnother online video article by WSJ: “Google to Distribute MTV Clips: Deal for Ad-Backed Videos Could Bolster Revenue, Broaden Viacom’s Reach” by Matthew Karnitschnig. How’d you like to have that last name and have to spell it to people 4 times in a row every single day?

The Highlights

  • Google will distribute video programming from Viacom’s MTV Networks. It starts this month with such programs as “SpongeBob SquarePants” and “Laguna Beach.”
  • Google will distribute these to a subset of its network — made up of thousands of Web sites — to place paid-search ads on behalf of a vast array of advertisers. “Our technology takes MTV’s video, marries it to an ad and shows it on a third site.
  • No one’s ever done this before,” Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt said in an interview. “If this works, it would be a very large business for all players.”

Nobody has ever done that?! I love you Google, but that’s patently wrong. It’s called “Revvtagging” and Revver started in 2005. I can understand the Google CEO claiming it, but I’d have thought WSJ’s Karnetstchnigading would fact check that one.

Pictured above is a new invention Schmidt and a team created last weekend. It’s an electric current that passes through a thin filament, heating it and causing it to emit light. The enclosing glass “Goog-bulb” prevents the oxygen in air from reaching the hot filament, which would be otherwise rapidly destroyed by oxidation. Patent filed.

Creating The Frankenstein of Online Video Sites

frankenstein.jpgDid you ever play the game in college where you tried to imagine the perfect woman, and you’d combine parts from various people you knew? Kinda like building the Frankenstein of women? Jennifer’s nose, Cathy’s eyes, Christy’s… um… personality, etc.?

That’s what we’re going to play now. I’ll start. I’m going to create the perfect online video site, and you tell me what I’ve missed or called wrong.

  1. The popularity, speed and community of YouTube
  2. The commerce functionality of Google Video
  3. The ability to search multiple sites of Yahoo Video
  4. The ad-sharing model of Revver
  5. The simplicity of Metacafe
  6. The advanced sharing functionality of Blip.tv
  7. The search power of Blinkx
  8. The hysterical content from eBaums and Break

What am I missing?

Making Sure Your Video Gets Found on Google

Most online-video sites are doing a good job of search-engine optimizing videos for Google and other search engines. If you search videos by your title or username, the link to the site should be in the first page results. There are a few things you can do to help ensure this works for you:

  1. Select keywords that are highly searched words, and very specific about your content
  2. Don’t neglect the “description” field. Revver, for instance, doesn’t display the description. But the description is part of what the Google search-engine spiders crawl
  3. If you’re making a video about something that’s already being searched (mentos and coke) try mispellings. There’s less competition there.

The Sweet 16 Online Video Sites

As an update on a recent report about popular online video sites, here are the latest site rankings of online video sites according to Alexa. Not all of the online video sites allow for uploading and sharing, so they’re not all packed with viral videos.

* Refers to those that give you the ability to upload

$ Refers to those that share revenue with video creators

  1. *YouTube: 17
  2. *Google Video: (Doesn’t rank video site alone)
  3. *Yahoo Video: (Doesn’t rank video site alone)
  4. *AOL Video: (Doesn’t rank video site alone)
  5. *Metacafe: 161
  6. Break.com: 297
  7. eBaumsWorld: 553
  8. iFilm: 859
  9. Heavy.com: 969
  10. Grouper: 2,981
  11. $*Revver: 5,799
  12. AtomFilms: 6,328
  13. GoFish: 8,434
  14. $*Blip.TV: 15,611
  15. $*Eefoof: 26,159
  16. JumpCut: 27,821

P.S. ClipShack: 37,750, CubeBreak: 294,151, The DailyReel: (too new)