Category Archives: Google

Top 10 Online-Video Predictions for 2007

sit.jpgI pulled out my crystal ball this morning, and I’m predicting the most significant online-video highlights of 2007.

I’ll be citing these selectively at the end of 2007 (only those in which I was right).

Okay I didn’t use a crystal ball. This video tells a better story about the process I used to arrive at these today.

  1. Online video and television collide then converge. We’ve seen small steps toward this, but they’re trivial relative to what will happen in 2007. We’re first going to see some territorializing between online-video players and larger networks and media distributors. Then we’ll start to see great partnerships between major networks and online video sites, as well as deals with Verizon, Comcast and TiVo that give online video creators much broader exposure.
  2. Consolidation of online video sites will increase exponentially. Eventually there will be only a small hand-full of sites (GooTube, AOL, Yahoo) where people upload videos, because those sites will gain critical mass and cut exclusive deals upstream. Almost every industry starts with hundreds of players, consolidates to a dozen, and finally matures with 2-3 major entities. Small sites will get acquired or fade. There will still be niche sites like Break.com and special-interest sites.
  3. amanda.jpgViral video creators will “cross over” to television. We saw Amandon Congdon make the leap from Rocketboom to ABC recently. People with talent, like ZeFrank, will land a short segment on The Daily Show or some other television show. Ultimately this will make ZeFrank’s bloated ego explode — something we hope occurs live on Good Morning America. A few name-brand stars will decide they can move online without the hassle of networks. I don’t see any of these succeeding initially, but as the audience for “online video” surpasses (in some areas) television viewers, it will be hard for them to resist.
  4. Many television shows will develop online manifestations. This will include “behind the scenes” shots, extended storylines, and interactions with the show. Some shows will invite submissions by amateurs and even cast amateurs to participate.
  5. Consortiums will form for economies of scale. Viacom/Fox/NBC/CBS are already toying with an anti-YouTube play. This is as impossible to resist as it is to achieve airlift. Other consortiums will succeed. I see groups of independent online video amateurs forming copperatives to market their content to networks, or networks organizing the coops. Shows like RabbitBites will have higher odds of moving to mainstream when connected with similar content.
  6. Select amateur video creators will begin to make a full-time living without “crossing over” to television. Metacafe‘s CEO Arik Czerniak recently told me he anticipates his top amatuer creators will make six-figure incomes in 2007. I think he’s right. I’d also watch for people earning high revenue via Revver if the company rapidly expands its viewer base through affiliate/syndicate partnerships.
  7. crystal_ball_juggling.jpgA major news story will break via live (or close to live) footage by “citizen journalists” holding cameras. Remember the impact of the Rodney King footage? Consider how more of these we’ll see now that so many of us are equipped with cell phones that record video. And eventually we’ll see live footage from a cell phone in a major news story — a robbery, hostage situation or natural disaster. If the reporters can address the nation live via satellite, why can’t the amateur videographer via a video-enabled cell phone? It will look like garbage, but it will be horrifically real.
  8. Marketers will get smarter about how they gain consumer mindshare through online video. The self-created viral videos will give way to more creative partnerships between brands and top video creators. These deals will be efficient for marketers, and highly profitable for video creators with low budgets. We’ll see increasingly fewer $250K viral video series created by agencies, and more low-budget, fun videos that were inspired by amateurs but get the media support of advertising budgets.
  9. lonelygirl15.jpgReal vs. fake will be a major 2007 theme. People don’t understand that some videos are designed to be “story telling,” and others are real footage. LonelyGirl15 was an example of a deliberate ruse, but many other “are they real or not” videos are endlessly dissected by comments. This will catch media’s attention, since they’ll enjoy raising viewer concerns about the integrity and validity of this threatening medium.
  10. The “big boy” sites are going to start sharing advertising revenue with select creators like some smaller sites (Revver, Metacafe, Blip, Brightcove, Lulu). That means Google, YouTube, Yahoo and AOL will finally realize that good content means eyeballs. And eyeballs means more revenue.

Top 10 Viral Video Moments of 2006

Given that 2006 was the Year of Online Video, we’d be remiss not to look back at the special highlights of this year.

This is not another “top viral videos of the year” list. Goodness knows there are hundreds of those. Instead we’re looking at the moments that changed the industry or perception of it. Our editors debated literally for minutes on this list, so we’d appreciate your additions in the comments. We’ll revise accordingly. It’s actually just me, but I’m using a royal “we.”

  1. gootube1.jpgGoogle buys YouTube for $1.65 billion. Huh? The absurd market cap that YouTube commanded despite low income and pirated content demonstrates the value of you, dear online-video viewer. There’s a race to own your little eyeballs. The moment made us uncomfortable because it flashes us back to the Pets.com era, but it validated the video space to mainstream, and taught people the power of community.
  2. lonely.jpgLonelyGirl15 revealed as an actress. Don’t believe everything you watch, folks. This was a sobering moment to millions of people living parasocial relationships with Bree via her YouTube videos. Some celebrated it, and moved to LonelyGirl15 where she serves her videos via Revver. Others groaned because they felt she violated the “realness” of the YouTube community. There are still ‘Tubers that dissect each of my videos to prove they’re fake. People, I did not really steal my neighbors Christmas tree. It’s called story telling, idiots, and you can say what you like about LonelyGirl15 but it’s undeniably a story people want to experience.
  3. eepy.jpgDiet Coke & Mentos. If you aren’t familiar with this movement, please turn off your computer and return to your couch. This was fascinating mostly from the corporate reaction. Mentos jumped right in and supported the video creators with sponsorship on Revver, contests and special partnerships. Coke distanced itself initially, and then eventually embraced it too late. My favorite remains the Pepsi Girl by Davideo.
  4. People started making money from online video. Don’t trust me? Listen to NPR’s report on it. EepyBird makes more than $35,000 on a few Diet Coke & Mentos Experiment videos. A comedy duo made more than $35,000 via Revver (a site that shares advertising revenue) from a series of videos showing elaborate fountains of exploding Coke. Later they would get a 6-figure deal with Google & Coke for a sequel.
  5. me-copy.jpgTIME magazine names consumer-generated media the “Person of the Year” in 2006. Hello, mainstream media — this video sharing thing isn’t a fad. It’s profoundly changing the way we consume media, interact and consume advertising. Perhaps the funniest part of this article was the instant response by bloggers, vloggers and video creators. Each decided we were individually the Person of the Year. Except me. I’m above that petty behavior.
  6. Michael Richards goes on racial tirade at The Laugh Factory. This was upsetting, but a reminder of the accountability power of video. Would that have made international news had someone not caught it on tape? It spawned instant spoofs like “The Lost Seinfeld Episode.”
  7. chronic_narnia.jpgThe Lazy Sunday Rap (Chronicles of Narnia) by Saturday Night Live goes wild on YouTube. NBC reacts by sending a 15-page “cease and desist” instead of basking in the free publicity of the ailing show. And it later partners with YouTube. Now the network is even exploring running dress rehearsals online. The sheer number of horrendous knockoffs of this video reaffirms that it was a paramount moment of 2006.
  8. Net Neutrality movement grows. I don’t really understand this, but I think it’s important. Here’s a video on it.
  9. Public Relations firm busted for making Al Gore Penguin spoof. DCI Group was exposed by the Wall Street Journal for secretly funding a video about global warming and Al Gore.
  10. buggs.jpgAnd lastly, my favorite! Marketers give a giant “Lennie Small (Of Mice & Men) squeeze” to viral video, crushing its lil’ head in adoration. Countless big brands did Lemming dives into viral video by creating such hits as Tea Partay by Smirnoff, GM’s flying cars, as well as some additional case studies. Then there were the ailing video contests and viral commercials we didn’t forward like advertisers promised their clients. People, let’s resolve to make 2007 better on the viral video advertising front. Please read 7-Deadly-Sins of Viral Video Advertising.

What did I miss?

GooTube Conspiracy Needs Script Blueprint

gootube.jpgWe’ve issued a press release on the GooTube Conspiracy, and the “participative storytelling” has taken some interesting directions even since we wrote the release.

Here’s the creative challenge. The various plot branches are missing a trunk, as one of the videographers mentioned last night. Some of the characters — who submitted videos unsolicited — are asking for direction because they want to ensure their videos are relevant. So now it seems to want to shift from an organic to a more prescriptive storyline.

With that, we’re assembling some of the core players to develop the motive, prime plot and roles of individual characters. We’re using Stickam to brainstorm, and it’s probably one of the wildest projects on which I’ve ever worked. Most of us don’t know each other and are on totally different timelines… a woman in Paris who stays up to 6 a.m., a waiter in NYC that works the night shift, a PR professional that has a day job, and a high school teacher. Basic practicalities set in. Today I needed to update the storyline without being in the same location as one character. So he recorded his part and e-mailed me the audio file. We’re not really together in this clip called “Sleepless & Confused.”

matrix.jpgThis will eventually reach a peak, and we want to end it before it gets old. As Highlander says: “Better to burn out than to fade away.” In the meantime, we’re trying to focus the various contributors so that there’s a progressive storyline. It needs to build to something interesting and then have conflict and resolution. Dang- maybe I should have gone to film school instead of getting this stupid MBA.

If any of you have ideas, or know someone that’s interested in helping develop a “blueprint” of a plot… we’re all ears! Naturally we can’t pay because none of us have figured out how to make a dime on this. Maybe a sponsor will surface?

I’ve embedded my favorite video of the series. Here’s a guy that I would never have met, and we spoke at lunch yesterday for the first time.

Participative Storytelling Via Video: GooTube Conspiracy

youtubeconspiracy.jpgI used to play a game with my kids. I’d tell them a bedtime story and stop. They’d have to finish the sentence. Then we’d take it in the direction they wanted.

That’s the spirit behind The GooTubeConspiracy. The storyline is dictated by the viewers. Toss a good comment or video response and you’ll see the story take a new direction.

The challenging thing about this experiment is that it’s like publishing the first chapter of a book before finishing it. In fact I literally have no idea what will happen next or when it will end.

It’s fun this way, but I’m getting a little tired of the pajamas I locked myself into. And I really wish they hadn’t suggested I lose the car.

GooTube Conspiracy

gootube-conspiracy.jpgThe GooTube Conspiracy is becoming interactive. If you’re new to this, here’s the story. Steven Chen and Chad Hurley kidnapped me for reasons I can’t explain. My theory is that I did some anti-YouTube rants back in the 1970s and someone told them. Now I’ve been “on the run” from them. On the advice of some viewers I’ve now abandoned my car and I’m on foot.

I’ve gotten some video responses to help me get to the bottom of this. To catch up on the series, here’s the collection so far.

These are not shot in advance- I’m in as much suspense about the next video as the subscribers.

I just parked the domain www.gootubeconspiracy.com in case YouTube takes away my account.

Saying No to the $100 Million Bribe from Google

I wish I had more than a few dozen hours of video content. Maybe I’d get a sweet little offer from Google like the networks are getting. Courtesy of the ReelPopBlog.com, here’s a Business Week article about Google’s efforts to keep networks and programmers from suing YouTube/Google.

Here’s the funny thing. It’s the end of the year and you want to close your books favorably. How can you say no to $100 million? Especially if, say, the price was going to go down in 2007 (act now for our “2006 holiday bribe“).

I’ll tell you how you’d say no to the bribe. If you put your long-term interests above your short, and worked with “competitors” to build a network-friendly online consortium…. where consumers could find any show they need regardless of network. An iTunes or TiVo but one that wouldn’t demand a big piece of the action or have a separate agenda. An independent third-party that would aggregate programming online like Comcast has done in cable… but with allegiance to keeping all of network’s interests as a priority (I want to own my content, I want the majority of the ad dollars, but I recognize that nobody’s going to come to NBC.com to find my stuff).

Nice idea, Kevin, but it can’t work. Why? First, a start-up would need eyeballs (like YouTube) to get a seat at the table. Second, this would require the networks to cooperate. Ultimately their instinct to compete will cause them to individually cede control. Now that’s Googlelicious.

Would write more, but my exile continues. I’m using a libary computer and I see two guys staring at me.

Target Persona of Each Popular Video Site

The real test of a video site’s audience is what videos are featured or highly rated. This analysis by Steve Bryant of ReelPopBlog shows the top video of each site.

Partially fueled by this research and partially from my own vast experience of getting lost in these sites, here is…

Nalts‘ analysis on the “persona” of your representative user of the important video sites.

nerd.jpgYouTube: 19-year-old male. Lives with parents in San Diego. Has part-time job and recently broke up with girlfriend. His high-school classmates called him Booger and he can light his own farts (and rarely misses an occasion to demonstrate this).

Metacafe: Born in Europe, he lives in NYC with an alcoholic roommate. He’s 27 years old and works in the PR department of a music production company. He surfs porn at lunch, but purges his own cache.

iFilm: Female. Lives alone with cats. Still one project away from completing film school. Interns at Cleveland-based television station where her boss flirts with her.

Revver: Democrat. Was unpopular in college but didn’t care. Was smart enough to get A’s without studying, and smoked weed to escape the absurdity. Went to school in Northeast but has settled in LA where she’s working for a software firm and writing a novel she’ll not likely publish.
cathy.gif

Google Video: Housewife. Hoping people doesn’t notice she’s 40. Likes Cathy comic strip. Doesn’t realize there are other places besides Google to find online videos.

MySpace: Goth. Unknown gender. Smokes. Once got caught with his neighbor throwing lit matches at his dog.

What’s the Difference Between Google Video and YouTube?

mask.jpgWhy would Google want to own two video sites? Oh, silly. They’re not two video sites. Their differences are becoming apparent:

Google Video

  • Objective: create a video site with no discernible character or features. Keep it as an entirely different entity, and let it stagnate as the market changes. Don’t promote the video site on Google homepage until emerging player has surfaced.
  • What it Could Have Been: The one-stop shop for all videos (just as it is for content and images). A great search tool for any video on any site. The king of linking video content to relevant ads. A way for small creators to distribute content and get paid a portion of the ad revenue. Turns out, however, TechCrunch is reporting Google Video will hoard ad revenue unless you’re the media elite.  I’m really disappointed about that… those of us with less than 1,000 hours of video content will have to look elsewhere.
  • cigar.jpgTarget Content: Stuff you can find on cable, television, video on demand or your local Blockbusters… brought to you by fat guys with cigars.

YouTube

  • Objective: Invent an easy way to share videos, which evolves organically into an incredibly popular community of viral content…  mostly stolen from television and posted in direct violation to copyright laws. If you get objections, blame the submitters, and provide their home phone numbers when lawyers call.  
  • What it Could Have Been: A new distribution channel for video creators that have great imaginations but low budgets. A method by which “big media” could promote and discover new talent. A bridge between “lean forward” and “lean back” television– connecting with networks and bandwidth providers to change television.
  • stoner.jpgTarget Content: Anything ripped from any source. Until the attorneys come. Then it will be mostly videos of stoned skateboarders, babbling teenagers and commercials masquerading as “viral videos.”

It’s a great day to be a smaller online video site with lower costs, greater revenue sharing and content you’re allowed to post. Watch the Revvers, Metacafes and Brightcoves. They’re meeting unmet needs and will be spending money on ad representatives instead of attorneys. They’ll also forge partnerships with surprising companies that will change our view of the landscape.

As YouTube is cleansed and commercialized the small creators will follow the money, and the eyeballs will follow the creators.

Google Hands Out $50 million checks to Media Companies to “Shut Up and Look the Other Way”

bribe1.jpgThis post could be entirely fictitious, but it’s absolutely fascinating anyway. It’s a fantastic scenario that would explain how Google rationalized the $1.65 purchase of YouTube. The source? Mark Cuban’s anonymous but trusted source — who first posted this theory on the Pho List.

Here’s how the saucy story goes:

  1. Google actually paid $1.15 billion to YouTube, and maintained $500 million to handle the ensuing copyright-infringement battles.
  2. If you’re a big media company (network or studio) trying to sue YouTube, you have two options: 1) Take a $50 million check and leave Google alone for 6 months… maybe sue some of the other guys, or 2) fight a long legal battle.
  3. The $50 million check wouldn’t be a payment, of course. That might be illegal. Instead the payment has to be engineered as ANYTHING but a licensing arrangement. Otherwise the media houses would have to (gasp) share the proceeds with creators.
  4. The transaction, instead, is YouTube granting $50 million in stock to the media house, which Google promptly buys.
  5. Now Google has the “monkey off its back” for long enough to figure out how to make YouTube sustainable. And gets to enjoy watching the big media players sue its competitors… which, in turn, makes them worse and blemished to potential buyers.

 Here are some of the problems I’m having with the story

  • Secrets like this are impossible to keep.
  • A competitor can claim colusion, and copyright owners will legitimately argue they’ve been shut from a retroactive royalty mayment.
  • This is like feeding a dog. He’ll be back minutes later begging for more.
  • Someone small is going to be turned away at the $50 million handout window, and they’re going to be pissed and determined.

Said one comment on the blog… Eliot Spitzer would be all over this like a fat kid on a smarty.