Category Archives: google video

The Vaccine for Viral Video

As the “auteur of the awful,” who has also marketed vaccines, I believe I have a unique ability to instruct you on how to vaccinate the world from your viral video. Follow these 10 tips and I can almost guarantee you a non-viral video.

  1. vaccine.jpgMake it long. Say 5-10 minutes. Videotape yourself describing your day. Don’t leave anything out.
  2. Do a spoof on a commercial. Those sell. Try Bass-o-matic. Put things in blenders.
  3. Use an old webcam and be sure you’re a silhouette against some major light source.
  4. Shoot somewhere with ambient sound that overtakes everything you’re saying. Add loud music to make it more crazy. The kids love that.
  5. Tag your video with words in which you have no chance of ranking. Try comedy, humor, music and extreme.
  6. Beware of funny beginnings or endings. You want to gradually taper off and put the funny stuff in the middle. Pretend you’re making a funny sandwich.
  7. Make your thumbnail a big blur. It will keep make them curious on what the video contains. They’ll be like “I can’t resist finding out what this blur is; I’ll bet it’s funny.”
  8. Put the video on your own site and blog. But don’t put it on the big video sites (YouTube, Google Video, AOL Uncut, Yahoo Video). Otherwise people may not come to your site where you can have them register to see more ads.
  9. Be sure to put the video on Eefoof. That site gets loads of traffic and pays handsomely.
  10. Once you’ve got the video online, the eyeballs should start coming. No need to market it. The integrity of the content will speak for itself.

Portrait of a Viral Video Genius

viralvideo.jpgI was profiled in this important video about viral video. I’m so glad Nalts had an opportunity to share the meaning behind my viral video work.

So often I get the questions:

  • Is viral video be taught or is it an innate skill?
  • What makes you an undiscovered legend?
  • What is the greatest of all your viral video works?
  • What inspires you?

Here I share how my videos are whole wheat for the soul. See it on YouTube. See it on Revver.

Top 10 Online-Video Predictions for 2007

sit.jpgI pulled out my crystal ball this morning, and I’m predicting the most significant online-video highlights of 2007.

I’ll be citing these selectively at the end of 2007 (only those in which I was right).

Okay I didn’t use a crystal ball. This video tells a better story about the process I used to arrive at these today.

  1. Online video and television collide then converge. We’ve seen small steps toward this, but they’re trivial relative to what will happen in 2007. We’re first going to see some territorializing between online-video players and larger networks and media distributors. Then we’ll start to see great partnerships between major networks and online video sites, as well as deals with Verizon, Comcast and TiVo that give online video creators much broader exposure.
  2. Consolidation of online video sites will increase exponentially. Eventually there will be only a small hand-full of sites (GooTube, AOL, Yahoo) where people upload videos, because those sites will gain critical mass and cut exclusive deals upstream. Almost every industry starts with hundreds of players, consolidates to a dozen, and finally matures with 2-3 major entities. Small sites will get acquired or fade. There will still be niche sites like Break.com and special-interest sites.
  3. amanda.jpgViral video creators will “cross over” to television. We saw Amandon Congdon make the leap from Rocketboom to ABC recently. People with talent, like ZeFrank, will land a short segment on The Daily Show or some other television show. Ultimately this will make ZeFrank’s bloated ego explode — something we hope occurs live on Good Morning America. A few name-brand stars will decide they can move online without the hassle of networks. I don’t see any of these succeeding initially, but as the audience for “online video” surpasses (in some areas) television viewers, it will be hard for them to resist.
  4. Many television shows will develop online manifestations. This will include “behind the scenes” shots, extended storylines, and interactions with the show. Some shows will invite submissions by amateurs and even cast amateurs to participate.
  5. Consortiums will form for economies of scale. Viacom/Fox/NBC/CBS are already toying with an anti-YouTube play. This is as impossible to resist as it is to achieve airlift. Other consortiums will succeed. I see groups of independent online video amateurs forming copperatives to market their content to networks, or networks organizing the coops. Shows like RabbitBites will have higher odds of moving to mainstream when connected with similar content.
  6. Select amateur video creators will begin to make a full-time living without “crossing over” to television. Metacafe‘s CEO Arik Czerniak recently told me he anticipates his top amatuer creators will make six-figure incomes in 2007. I think he’s right. I’d also watch for people earning high revenue via Revver if the company rapidly expands its viewer base through affiliate/syndicate partnerships.
  7. crystal_ball_juggling.jpgA major news story will break via live (or close to live) footage by “citizen journalists” holding cameras. Remember the impact of the Rodney King footage? Consider how more of these we’ll see now that so many of us are equipped with cell phones that record video. And eventually we’ll see live footage from a cell phone in a major news story — a robbery, hostage situation or natural disaster. If the reporters can address the nation live via satellite, why can’t the amateur videographer via a video-enabled cell phone? It will look like garbage, but it will be horrifically real.
  8. Marketers will get smarter about how they gain consumer mindshare through online video. The self-created viral videos will give way to more creative partnerships between brands and top video creators. These deals will be efficient for marketers, and highly profitable for video creators with low budgets. We’ll see increasingly fewer $250K viral video series created by agencies, and more low-budget, fun videos that were inspired by amateurs but get the media support of advertising budgets.
  9. lonelygirl15.jpgReal vs. fake will be a major 2007 theme. People don’t understand that some videos are designed to be “story telling,” and others are real footage. LonelyGirl15 was an example of a deliberate ruse, but many other “are they real or not” videos are endlessly dissected by comments. This will catch media’s attention, since they’ll enjoy raising viewer concerns about the integrity and validity of this threatening medium.
  10. The “big boy” sites are going to start sharing advertising revenue with select creators like some smaller sites (Revver, Metacafe, Blip, Brightcove, Lulu). That means Google, YouTube, Yahoo and AOL will finally realize that good content means eyeballs. And eyeballs means more revenue.

Top 10 Viral Video Moments of 2006

Given that 2006 was the Year of Online Video, we’d be remiss not to look back at the special highlights of this year.

This is not another “top viral videos of the year” list. Goodness knows there are hundreds of those. Instead we’re looking at the moments that changed the industry or perception of it. Our editors debated literally for minutes on this list, so we’d appreciate your additions in the comments. We’ll revise accordingly. It’s actually just me, but I’m using a royal “we.”

  1. gootube1.jpgGoogle buys YouTube for $1.65 billion. Huh? The absurd market cap that YouTube commanded despite low income and pirated content demonstrates the value of you, dear online-video viewer. There’s a race to own your little eyeballs. The moment made us uncomfortable because it flashes us back to the Pets.com era, but it validated the video space to mainstream, and taught people the power of community.
  2. lonely.jpgLonelyGirl15 revealed as an actress. Don’t believe everything you watch, folks. This was a sobering moment to millions of people living parasocial relationships with Bree via her YouTube videos. Some celebrated it, and moved to LonelyGirl15 where she serves her videos via Revver. Others groaned because they felt she violated the “realness” of the YouTube community. There are still ‘Tubers that dissect each of my videos to prove they’re fake. People, I did not really steal my neighbors Christmas tree. It’s called story telling, idiots, and you can say what you like about LonelyGirl15 but it’s undeniably a story people want to experience.
  3. eepy.jpgDiet Coke & Mentos. If you aren’t familiar with this movement, please turn off your computer and return to your couch. This was fascinating mostly from the corporate reaction. Mentos jumped right in and supported the video creators with sponsorship on Revver, contests and special partnerships. Coke distanced itself initially, and then eventually embraced it too late. My favorite remains the Pepsi Girl by Davideo.
  4. People started making money from online video. Don’t trust me? Listen to NPR’s report on it. EepyBird makes more than $35,000 on a few Diet Coke & Mentos Experiment videos. A comedy duo made more than $35,000 via Revver (a site that shares advertising revenue) from a series of videos showing elaborate fountains of exploding Coke. Later they would get a 6-figure deal with Google & Coke for a sequel.
  5. me-copy.jpgTIME magazine names consumer-generated media the “Person of the Year” in 2006. Hello, mainstream media — this video sharing thing isn’t a fad. It’s profoundly changing the way we consume media, interact and consume advertising. Perhaps the funniest part of this article was the instant response by bloggers, vloggers and video creators. Each decided we were individually the Person of the Year. Except me. I’m above that petty behavior.
  6. Michael Richards goes on racial tirade at The Laugh Factory. This was upsetting, but a reminder of the accountability power of video. Would that have made international news had someone not caught it on tape? It spawned instant spoofs like “The Lost Seinfeld Episode.”
  7. chronic_narnia.jpgThe Lazy Sunday Rap (Chronicles of Narnia) by Saturday Night Live goes wild on YouTube. NBC reacts by sending a 15-page “cease and desist” instead of basking in the free publicity of the ailing show. And it later partners with YouTube. Now the network is even exploring running dress rehearsals online. The sheer number of horrendous knockoffs of this video reaffirms that it was a paramount moment of 2006.
  8. Net Neutrality movement grows. I don’t really understand this, but I think it’s important. Here’s a video on it.
  9. Public Relations firm busted for making Al Gore Penguin spoof. DCI Group was exposed by the Wall Street Journal for secretly funding a video about global warming and Al Gore.
  10. buggs.jpgAnd lastly, my favorite! Marketers give a giant “Lennie Small (Of Mice & Men) squeeze” to viral video, crushing its lil’ head in adoration. Countless big brands did Lemming dives into viral video by creating such hits as Tea Partay by Smirnoff, GM’s flying cars, as well as some additional case studies. Then there were the ailing video contests and viral commercials we didn’t forward like advertisers promised their clients. People, let’s resolve to make 2007 better on the viral video advertising front. Please read 7-Deadly-Sins of Viral Video Advertising.

What did I miss?

Participative Storytelling Via Video: GooTube Conspiracy

youtubeconspiracy.jpgI used to play a game with my kids. I’d tell them a bedtime story and stop. They’d have to finish the sentence. Then we’d take it in the direction they wanted.

That’s the spirit behind The GooTubeConspiracy. The storyline is dictated by the viewers. Toss a good comment or video response and you’ll see the story take a new direction.

The challenging thing about this experiment is that it’s like publishing the first chapter of a book before finishing it. In fact I literally have no idea what will happen next or when it will end.

It’s fun this way, but I’m getting a little tired of the pajamas I locked myself into. And I really wish they hadn’t suggested I lose the car.

GooTube Conspiracy

gootube-conspiracy.jpgThe GooTube Conspiracy is becoming interactive. If you’re new to this, here’s the story. Steven Chen and Chad Hurley kidnapped me for reasons I can’t explain. My theory is that I did some anti-YouTube rants back in the 1970s and someone told them. Now I’ve been “on the run” from them. On the advice of some viewers I’ve now abandoned my car and I’m on foot.

I’ve gotten some video responses to help me get to the bottom of this. To catch up on the series, here’s the collection so far.

These are not shot in advance- I’m in as much suspense about the next video as the subscribers.

I just parked the domain www.gootubeconspiracy.com in case YouTube takes away my account.

Saying No to the $100 Million Bribe from Google

I wish I had more than a few dozen hours of video content. Maybe I’d get a sweet little offer from Google like the networks are getting. Courtesy of the ReelPopBlog.com, here’s a Business Week article about Google’s efforts to keep networks and programmers from suing YouTube/Google.

Here’s the funny thing. It’s the end of the year and you want to close your books favorably. How can you say no to $100 million? Especially if, say, the price was going to go down in 2007 (act now for our “2006 holiday bribe“).

I’ll tell you how you’d say no to the bribe. If you put your long-term interests above your short, and worked with “competitors” to build a network-friendly online consortium…. where consumers could find any show they need regardless of network. An iTunes or TiVo but one that wouldn’t demand a big piece of the action or have a separate agenda. An independent third-party that would aggregate programming online like Comcast has done in cable… but with allegiance to keeping all of network’s interests as a priority (I want to own my content, I want the majority of the ad dollars, but I recognize that nobody’s going to come to NBC.com to find my stuff).

Nice idea, Kevin, but it can’t work. Why? First, a start-up would need eyeballs (like YouTube) to get a seat at the table. Second, this would require the networks to cooperate. Ultimately their instinct to compete will cause them to individually cede control. Now that’s Googlelicious.

Would write more, but my exile continues. I’m using a libary computer and I see two guys staring at me.

The Ultimate Revver Fan

revv.jpgI’m a big fan of Revver because it splits ad revenue. Maybe you are too. But this guy has us both topped. See the Ultimate Revver Fan. He pits Revver against YouTube and Google Video in this weird and amusing rant.

This just in! Visit the Revver blog and you’ll see three videos. Play them all at once and you can watch him argue in favor of YouTube and Google Video. This is at the top of the “I wish I’d thought of it” file.

When Will Preroll Ads Die?

It was a rhetorical question, but I hope preroll goes the way of pop-up ads soon. This Clickz reports that the industry consensus is that pre-rolls aren’t the solution. Kevin Newcomb reports from AdTech NYC:

At present, many marketers are simply porting their TV ads online to run as pre-roll. They’re doing that not because they think it’s the most effective way to market in the online video medium, but because that’s what their organizational challenges allow them to do, Janet Balis, senior VP of sales development for AOL Media Networks, said during a “TV 2.0” panel at Ad:tech. “Most are looking to buy 15- or 30-second pre-roll, not because it’s the most interesting thing people want to be doing, but because there are real challenges to transitioning online. A lot of people want to innovate, but it’s challenging to do that on a broad scale,” Balis said.

ruprick.JPGDaniel Blackman from Google has it figured out. Contextual persistent branding. Say it with me three times. Contextual persistent branding. Contextual persistent branding. Contextual persistent branding.

Oklahoma, Oklahoma, Oklahoma!

Common, guys. It’s so simple. Wrap compelling branding and “call to actions” around the videos viewed by your target audience. Compel them to interact, and greet them with an entertaining video. THEN you can hock your goods.

P.S. Steve Bryant is in the same place. See ReelPopBlog.

Finding the Right Online Video Site for Your Needs

I wrote this article for The Daily Reel about finding the right online video site — whether you’re after fame, fortune or friends.

Contrary to popular belief, YouTube isn’t the definitive video-sharing site for everyone. Knowing what you want is the first step in figuring out where to share. When it comes to sharing videos online, there are literally hundreds of sites to choose from. Knowing which one is right for you begins with knowing your style, your audience and — most importantly — your biggest goal. (click here to read more)