Hulu’s “Confidential” Ad-Selector Specs Leaked; YouTube Adopts Mandatory Pre-Rolls.

Just when you thought pre-rolls were dead, both Hulu and YouTube are embracing them in recent weeks. Hulu has officially rolled out an “Ad Selector,” where viewers can choose among several ads from a single sponsor. And YouTube, whose parent Google once chastised online-video pre-rolls for causing 75% abandonment rates, is now quietly experimenting with mandatory (unstoppable) 15-second pre-rolls before professional and amateur content.

Some brief background: When I spoke to Coke marketing executives about YouTube last year, I had the dubious role of following Hulu CEO Jason Kilar. He teased Coke marketers with an emerging ad offering that’s now officially called the “Ad Selector.” He showed how Coke could provide Hulu viewers a variety of options, where the individual could chose to watch one of several Coke commercials before enjoying a free show. I was thrilled at the model because a) it gives marketers insights, b) it provides consumers with choice, and c) the mere selection exposes the viewer to several brands.

Adweek recently reported that the Ad Selector works. The article cites research by “The Pool,” a study by Vivaki, now a Publicis Worldwide company. [editorial warning: both of the referenced agency websites are horribly annoying].

VivaKi’s research examined 29 different ad models over 16 months, and had participation from such brandsas Allstate, Applebee’s, Capital One and Nestle Purina PetCare. Overall, VivaKi officials said the group invested 230,000 hours of research, surveying over 25 million consumers.

Guess what? The Ad Selector delivered click-through rates that averaged 106 percent higher than pre-roll ads. Plus, online ad-recall scores were 290 percent higher than pre-rolls.

The Adweek/Media week prompted me to “Google” for the actual research (impossible to find on the agency’s website), and I instead found this “confidential” PDF document that outlines Hulu Ad Specifications (dated December 1, 2009).

In case the good folks at Hulu decide to “reconfidentialize” that PDF, here is a brief overview: The Ad Selector is an ad unit that allows the user to control their entire ad experience during video playback. At the beginning of their content play the user will be presented with 2 or 3 category options. Once a selection has been made, the user will be presented with video advertisements in the category of their choice. For example an automotive company could offer the user a selection of SUV, Truck or Coupe advertisements. If the user selects “SUV” the remaining breaks will playback commercials from the sponsor related to just to their area of interest (SUVs).

Yey for Jason and Hulu! Jason’s talk at Coke excited me because he revealed his primary goal was to provide online-video viewers with a positive experience, and wanted to ensure that advertisements did not interfere. Here’s another happyhulu moment: last night I discovered that neither iTunes nor Hulu had yet posted that night’s episode of Fringe (which I missed while flying to Chicago). Instead, I decided to catch Tuesday’s episode of “The Office,” and instinctively went to iTunes first. It was $2.99 (yipes) and iTunes wouldn’t let me watch it on my laptop (seems I’ve exceeded the 5-device rule). So I was pleased to find it free on Hulu, and welcomed the few short interstitial ads.

So now YouTube is imposing “unskippable” prerolls (although not yet with a friendly “selector” model). This is especially ironic since Google in 2007 cited abandonment rates of 75% for pre-rolls, albeit less so for 15-second ones. AdAge reported late last year that YouTube was experimenting with “optional” pre-rolls that a viewer can skip. But Google’s Erin Bouchier reports that viewers are enduring short pre-rolls on professional content, and lately YouTube is rolling out mandatory pre-rolls on short professional and amateur content.

Do you see a skip option on this 15-second preroll on this recent Smosh video pictured below? I don’t.

Just this week I spoke with a fellow YouTube Partner who agrees with my cautious view of these: unless they command significant revenue and are proven to not cause audience drop-off, we’d prefer to turn these off. That said, neither of us has been invited to participate in this program (our options are limited to InVideo ads or adjacent banners).

15-second preroll advertisement is mandatory to watch short comedy video.

The bottom line? I’m a marketer and we need our advertising to work. I’m also a YouTube Partner and welcome models that command higher revenue for YouTube and myself. But I’m a viewer too, and I like control. Even my kids have learned to instinctively close InVideo ads (the ones that appear over the bottom 1/4 of a video), so I’m concerned about their sustainability.

My prediction is that YouTube will follow Hulu’s lead and soon give YouTube viewers a choice of ads. I would also expect that mandatory pre-rolls, if they do endure, will only work a) before highly valued video content, b) with longer formats (like 22-minute shows), and c) in very short form with 15 seconds being the maximum for 2-3 minute videos.

And, guys, I’m still rooting for an alternative to the pre-roll ad that places the 15-second advertisement inside the show. It’s not a simple solution, but it sure would help content creators engage audiences, and encourage them to sustain through an advertisement that would work.

Author: Nalts

Hi. I'm Nalts.

6 thoughts on “Hulu’s “Confidential” Ad-Selector Specs Leaked; YouTube Adopts Mandatory Pre-Rolls.”

  1. I’d be willing to try the more interactive preroll ad, but I don’t want to do it on EVERY video I go to watch.
    Make that every 3 to 4 videos and I’d be fine with it.
    I’m subscribed to almost 300 channels on Youtube of which at least 70 are partnered. If I had to watch or interact with 70 prerolls I would just go to some other webpage.
    I know folks need to be paid, but the $0.0025 or whatever they are getting is not worth wasting that much of my time. It’s just like the prerolls on BlogTV, awful.
    But I put up with it because I stay on that channel for a while and actually interact with the broadcaster.
    More than the average Youtube video length of 3 minutes.
    How about some rotating ads NEXT to the video that’s being viewed? A static ad will not get my attention, but animated graphic ads on a slideshow rotation next to the video (without sound) would.
    Damn, I should patent that idea…
    eh, screw it.

  2. Agencies should make the ads better so viewers will watch them more.

    Better idea, but harder to execute: Let the creators produce their own pre-roll spots for their own videos.

    It’s like anything else: if the content is good, engaging, etc. I’ll watch it, whether it’s an ad or what-have-you.

  3. Slater- true… better creative would help a LOT. But repurposed television ads aint doing it. I kinda like those video units (with no audio) that are appearing besides videos now.

  4. I hate pre-rolls – as I recently experienced them en-masse on hulu – but it makes sense from hulu’s POV since I can block anything java/flash/popup with firefox add-ons.

    As a viewer I am happy to have the mute along with the dot indicator telling me when a commercial is going to pop up – I have my finger ready on the trigger.

    However, it’s a shame I can’t pick the types of commercials I would actually watch or enjoy which hulu doesn’t provide, that just makes me hunt for sites that stream the same content commercial free.

    Get a clue hulu.

    Shame they dumped, for the most part, the one commercial at the beginning, that was at least tolerable, but probably not profitable. Though, the trend currently is ‘down with profits!’ unless you’re a wall street banker.

    Another problem is volume, the commercials are much louder than the content on hulu – a new law will soon stop that nonsense across TV-land – let’s hope it either applies to online video or hulu et al freely follow suit.

    You Tube will probably do the same. Defiantly on longer content, but for shorter videos they might try to run pre-rolls like they manage comments. For every 5 you watch/lay, in a certain amount of time, instead of the captcha they will run a pre-roll; ifilm used to do that and everyone moved to YouTube.

    This of course will suck for partners if forced to use them and will cut the time I spend on YouTube. Twitter and following the right people will be invaluable at that point.

    Though admittedly that is already happening, I am spending less time on YouTube. The reason’s why would make for a prefect segway into the future of social media which Kevin mentioned and I was hoping he would blog about… not too late.

    Anyway, if YouTube starts pre-rolling between short content I believe new themed sites will open up and that’s always a good thing.

    one thing is certain, it’s best to count the chickens hatched and not the eggs laid.

  5. I’ve been wondering about these for some time now, and I don’t know why I didn’t think to look on your blog. Of course you’d know about it. It’s at the heart of what you do.

    I’ve seen some pre-rolls on old episodes of =3, and I just figured that it was an option that everyone (who is partnered) had, but Ray just used to to make old content as valuable as his new stuff. That being said, those pre-rolls were of a different variety than the ones I’ve been seeing lately. I was surprised to see one yesterday on an episode of Truth or Fail, as I know Hank Green isn’t a huge fan of them. So what I’m gathering is that these pre-rolls are another option for partners, and not something YouTube is doing to line their own pockets without anyone else benefitting (as I had originally thought). Am I confusing this?

  6. I hate the new pre-rolls on Youtube, simply because there is currently no volume option to turn them down.
    They come on far louder than the actual videos, and since the volume option is not there, I don’t even see the ad because I am too busy scrambling to open the master PC volume to mute it.

    Overall a poor idea with poor execution.

Comments are closed.