<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Yahoo Video&#8217;s Latest Evolution Work?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willvideoforfood.com/2009/03/17/can-yahoo-video-crack-the-hidden-layer-of-content-audiences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2009/03/17/can-yahoo-video-crack-the-hidden-layer-of-content-audiences/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=can-yahoo-video-crack-the-hidden-layer-of-content-audiences</link>
	<description>Online-Video &#38; YouTube Tips for Video Creators, Marketers and Entrepeneurs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Jennings</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2009/03/17/can-yahoo-video-crack-the-hidden-layer-of-content-audiences/#comment-141514</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=3262#comment-141514</guid>
		<description>I like Yahoo video because they feature me a lot. I wish they monetized my streams there like YouTube does. Until they do that, it&#039;s just a place a I publish to because I clicked a box on Tubemogul. I don&#039;t spend any time cultivating my audience there because, even though people comment, it&#039;s far less. Butterfinger pays to sponsor that comedy area, I provide content for it a lot, and I never see a dime. Doesn&#039;t really seem fair. What do you think Nalts? 

And oh - have you shot your Punchy 3 part yet!? :)

-Bobby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Yahoo video because they feature me a lot. I wish they monetized my streams there like YouTube does. Until they do that, it&#8217;s just a place a I publish to because I clicked a box on Tubemogul. I don&#8217;t spend any time cultivating my audience there because, even though people comment, it&#8217;s far less. Butterfinger pays to sponsor that comedy area, I provide content for it a lot, and I never see a dime. Doesn&#8217;t really seem fair. What do you think Nalts? </p>
<p>And oh &#8211; have you shot your Punchy 3 part yet!? <img src='http://willvideoforfood.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-Bobby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jischinger</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2009/03/17/can-yahoo-video-crack-the-hidden-layer-of-content-audiences/#comment-140670</link>
		<dc:creator>jischinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=3262#comment-140670</guid>
		<description>yahoo yahoo yahoo
that&#039;s the perfect picture

I&#039;m ambivalent about yahoo, I grew up with yahoo. After webcrawler yahoo was the first really big website stuff thingy. Then they got all corporate with their TOS, turned into pac man started gobbling everything up. They probably set most of the mainstream standards on the net. At one time their stock was worth more than the GDP of New Zealand, now, who knows... I don&#039;t use much of what they offer today, less if MS buys them. Google is still king, but somehow I&#039;m glad yahoo is there, least as competition and an alternative to Google.

Yahoo needs something really big</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yahoo yahoo yahoo<br />
that&#8217;s the perfect picture</p>
<p>I&#8217;m ambivalent about yahoo, I grew up with yahoo. After webcrawler yahoo was the first really big website stuff thingy. Then they got all corporate with their TOS, turned into pac man started gobbling everything up. They probably set most of the mainstream standards on the net. At one time their stock was worth more than the GDP of New Zealand, now, who knows&#8230; I don&#8217;t use much of what they offer today, less if MS buys them. Google is still king, but somehow I&#8217;m glad yahoo is there, least as competition and an alternative to Google.</p>
<p>Yahoo needs something really big</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

