$100,000 Prize for YouTube Video That Doesn’t Suck

November 13, 2008

The Onion reports that YouTube is offering a $100,000 prize for any video that is actually good. No entries have yet appeared in YouTube’s new “Actually Good” tab, according to this story. If you’re careful, you’ll see that MIKMA makes a subtle cameo with “Mikma was here.” That’s either a complete coincidence or evidence that The Onion writers are actually surfing YouTube.

I for one will not enter. I’m going to focus on the brand contests where the least crappy consumer-generated video gets $100 off any $2000 purchase at McDonalds (only at 3 participating McDonalds that will not be identified).

YouTube Contest Challenges Users To Make A ‘Good’ Video

No related posts.

Comments Closed

{ 23 comments }

1 Marilyn November 13, 2008 at 7:38 am

You could have at least given me credit for sending you the video.

2 sukatra November 13, 2008 at 7:53 am

What marilyn said, only credit to me instead. Just because.

3 Peter Coffin November 13, 2008 at 9:11 am

I’m working on a contest entry to explain a carbon cap. I have an awesome analogy involving Three’s Company. I intend to get that up over the weekend.

4 DahliaK November 13, 2008 at 10:09 am

Actually, I was the first one in this “tribe” to mention the YouTube “actually good” contest video (made on the Onion account) and my post from Online Video Ads & Targeting comments has been deleted. Why? Was it because I said it pisses me off to do Nalts’ job for him?

Also from that thread, my praise of Marquis de Jolie’s poem is gone.

What gives? They were posted at one time. Must be moderated out of existence. If there isn’t free speech here, I’m taking my bat and ball and go home.

5 Brian November 13, 2008 at 10:26 am

I have read about this contest but for some reason I don’t think its real. I really want to promote my video cuz I know its pretty good but I can’t get a break :(

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTLwulT2eG0

If anyone including nalts has a chance feel free to watch.

-Brian (applingfbabys)

6 somecallmejim November 13, 2008 at 11:08 am

I was the first to note the great Mikma’s cameo, at least via twitter. I honestly don’t know if the mikma thing was intentional or not. On one hand, anyone who’s been immersed in YouTube culture for any amount of time knows that MIKMA WAS HERE. On the other hand, Mikma is like Santa Claus – he’s everywhere. I don’t know how the guy does it, but he’s somehow managed to watch every video online ever made. He must be a robot.

@4

I doubt that our benevolent leader is messing with you. Okay, he probably is, but that’s okay – he does it with all of us.

@Nalts

I can’t enter this one either. I’m working on my entry for the “Best Attention Whoring” contest. Hey, wanna collab with me on that?

7 somecallmejim November 13, 2008 at 11:16 am

@5

Normally I ignore attention-seeking, but since I’m in an especially attention-seeking mood myself lately, I checked out the video, and I actually found it to be amusing. After watching your mac parody I went along and subscribed.

Now quick! Subscribe to me before you forget how gracious and benevolent I’ve been! :-D

8 Hannah November 13, 2008 at 11:34 am

@ 4 – DahliaK… I think you’re kidding, right? I tried to post earlier on this thread (I would have been #3 and it didn’t post). I think we’re having comment glitches. Let’s see if this posts this time.

9 marquisdejolie November 13, 2008 at 12:11 pm

Ahyup, there are comment glitches here again. Starting a couple of days ago, I could no longer use my regular email address to have a comment accepted here. I had to switch to an alternate email address.

And I’ve had some comments post and then disappear. Meh.

10 jischinger November 13, 2008 at 3:13 pm

I’m not saying anything, just letting the facts speak for themselves.

One thing I will make note of however, this was quite a slam at You Tube and their users, but as they say in the biz, PR is still PR

missing comments could be several things: you posted during a back up, blue’s servers are suffering from indigestion, Kevin is accidentally deleting your comment rather than all the crappy casino spam that’s been bombarding this blog or some other thing I can’t think of at the moment, but I don’t think he would do it on purpose.

11 Reubnick November 13, 2008 at 3:17 pm

Mikma has even been on the Onion?!? Where hasn’t that guy been??? I thought he had made the transition to Vloggerheads, where he will be accepted by other creepy bald old men, but it looks like he’s still being everywhere on youtube.

12 Diane November 13, 2008 at 3:44 pm

Wow, now that is a contest prize! :)

13 Bobby J. November 13, 2008 at 6:11 pm

Nalts, we need the blog post about YouTube/Google offering up sponsored video placement for payola… I’m about to go OFF up in the heezy fo’sheezy!

14 somecallmejim November 13, 2008 at 6:33 pm
15 marquisdejolie November 13, 2008 at 6:38 pm

Taxpayers gave billions to the airlines and they repaid us by demanding the right to imprison us without food or water on the tarmac for 10 hours.

If we give the auto industries ANOTHER 20 billion dollars, they’ll demand we buy cars without transmissions (optional). Hide and watch.

16 somecallmejim November 13, 2008 at 6:52 pm

@15

Cars without transmissions could be the thing of the future. Because they’re so efficient, most electric vehicles don’t need a tranny. So, from my CNN spinning class I took last fall, what you’re saying is that a bailout for automakers is going to lead to more efficient, potentially zero emission vehicles. Sweet!

17 marquisdejolie November 13, 2008 at 7:23 pm

^ Steering wheels, brakes and wheels optional (extra).

18 somecallmejim November 13, 2008 at 7:24 pm

@17

Computer-steered flying cars that don’t need brakes because tey harness the power of the Earth’s magnetic field? Sweet!

19 somecallmejim November 13, 2008 at 7:25 pm

I can play this game all night long. Someday I’m going to make a politician very happy.

20 marquisdejolie November 13, 2008 at 7:37 pm

^ You win. I’m sick, out of auto parts and watching and interesting wolf show on Animal Planet.

21 JimmerSD November 14, 2008 at 8:26 am

Oh I see, now they want quality! You just can’t satisfy some people. ;p

Good or fast or cheap

Pick any two

22 somecallmejim November 14, 2008 at 8:59 am

@Jimmer

You can have all three if you remember that cheap is objective. Steven Spielberg could show up and throw $10,000 into a viral video, and that’s what – his lunch money for the week?

Hmm…I need to go out to lunch with Spielberg more often.

23 thoughtchallenge November 20, 2008 at 9:50 pm

Maybe if we all get together we can make an “Actually Good” video. It would be kind of a collab. We’ll hafta keep Nalts out of it though, he tends to be a camera hog ya’ know.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: