<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Ten Stupidest Moments of Online Video in 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/</link>
	<description>Inside Online-Video for Creators, Viewers, Marketers and Advertisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:56:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7603</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/#comment-7603</guid>
		<description>The Oprah episode which featured YouTube was very painful.  I felt like I was transported back to the late &#039;90s when broadcast media was still trying to describe what a website was all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Oprah episode which featured YouTube was very painful.  I felt like I was transported back to the late &#8217;90s when broadcast media was still trying to describe what a website was all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sukatra</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7535</link>
		<dc:creator>sukatra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/#comment-7535</guid>
		<description>Avi - I&#039;m quite worried about you. I suggest you see a proctologist immediately so he can take that stick out of your ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avi &#8211; I&#8217;m quite worried about you. I suggest you see a proctologist immediately so he can take that stick out of your ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7534</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/#comment-7534</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the story link:

http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=3783</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the story link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=3783" rel="nofollow">http://www.jewlicious.com/?p=3783</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7533</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/#comment-7533</guid>
		<description>Re: #5.   Google actually never challenged the website, JewTube.   They simply asked a completely different company, NetParty, to voluntarily withdraw their trademark application.  NetParty, which conceded JewTube Corp. had first use conceded to Google.  And, the real JewTube (www.jewtube.com) signed a revenue-sharing agreement with Google.   Consequently, this would hardly qualify as the 5th stupidest moment in online video, unless you&#039;d be referring to the countless website (including your site) who got the story completely wrong by failing to do a little research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: #5.   Google actually never challenged the website, JewTube.   They simply asked a completely different company, NetParty, to voluntarily withdraw their trademark application.  NetParty, which conceded JewTube Corp. had first use conceded to Google.  And, the real JewTube (www.jewtube.com) signed a revenue-sharing agreement with Google.   Consequently, this would hardly qualify as the 5th stupidest moment in online video, unless you&#8217;d be referring to the countless website (including your site) who got the story completely wrong by failing to do a little research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jischinger</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7513</link>
		<dc:creator>jischinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/#comment-7513</guid>
		<description>I have to think about this a bit more, but I think 8, 9 and 10 where the stupidest. I&#039;m conflicted with the Oprah deal, I saw it as a blow for the net and an unfortunate win for TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to think about this a bit more, but I think 8, 9 and 10 where the stupidest. I&#8217;m conflicted with the Oprah deal, I saw it as a blow for the net and an unfortunate win for TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marquisdejolie</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7507</link>
		<dc:creator>marquisdejolie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/#comment-7507</guid>
		<description>How about Chris Crocker&#039;s infamously stupid follow-up video to his &quot;Leave Brittany Alone&quot; smash? In his follow-up video, he spits on the camera lens and tells FOX News and everybody else who doesn&#039;t love and respect him to go to hell. He lost a lot of sympathy on that bite-the-hand grossness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Chris Crocker&#8217;s infamously stupid follow-up video to his &#8220;Leave Brittany Alone&#8221; smash? In his follow-up video, he spits on the camera lens and tells FOX News and everybody else who doesn&#8217;t love and respect him to go to hell. He lost a lot of sympathy on that bite-the-hand grossness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marquisdejolie</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7495</link>
		<dc:creator>marquisdejolie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/#comment-7495</guid>
		<description>How about Renetto doing that creepy incest video?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Renetto doing that creepy incest video?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NutCheese</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7492</link>
		<dc:creator>NutCheese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/12/11/top-ten-stupidest-moments-of-online-video-in-2007/#comment-7492</guid>
		<description>Weinergate didn&#039;t make the list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weinergate didn&#8217;t make the list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
