<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 7 Theories: Why YouTube Decided to Pay Creators&#8230; Finally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/01/27/top-7-theories-why-youtube-decided-to-pay-creators-finally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/01/27/top-7-theories-why-youtube-decided-to-pay-creators-finally/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=top-7-theories-why-youtube-decided-to-pay-creators-finally</link>
	<description>Online-Video &#38; YouTube Tips for Video Creators, Marketers and Entrepeneurs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hosting Reviews</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/01/27/top-7-theories-why-youtube-decided-to-pay-creators-finally/#comment-3297</link>
		<dc:creator>Hosting Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=1354#comment-3297</guid>
		<description>love the lists</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love the lists</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YOUTUBEtheater</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/01/27/top-7-theories-why-youtube-decided-to-pay-creators-finally/#comment-3296</link>
		<dc:creator>YOUTUBEtheater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=1354#comment-3296</guid>
		<description>Tripplehelix

I actually became &quot;known&quot; through advertising (you call it spamming, I call it advertising), but became &quot;big&quot; (although not really that big), when I was featured.
I wasn&#039;t going to spend all that time producing something for no one to watch it. I had to get the word out somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tripplehelix</p>
<p>I actually became &#8220;known&#8221; through advertising (you call it spamming, I call it advertising), but became &#8220;big&#8221; (although not really that big), when I was featured.<br />
I wasn&#8217;t going to spend all that time producing something for no one to watch it. I had to get the word out somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The true power (and cost) of global collaboration. &#124; Uncommon Knowledge.</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/01/27/top-7-theories-why-youtube-decided-to-pay-creators-finally/#comment-3284</link>
		<dc:creator>The true power (and cost) of global collaboration. &#124; Uncommon Knowledge.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=1354#comment-3284</guid>
		<description>[...] (since being purchased by Google) seems to think paying content creators is the right way to go. It would seem that Google has decided to &#8216;do the right thing&#8217; and pay content [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (since being purchased by Google) seems to think paying content creators is the right way to go. It would seem that Google has decided to &#8216;do the right thing&#8217; and pay content [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripplehelix</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/01/27/top-7-theories-why-youtube-decided-to-pay-creators-finally/#comment-3283</link>
		<dc:creator>tripplehelix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=1354#comment-3283</guid>
		<description>Lets just put it this way: I get bored during &#039;free time&#039; at school...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets just put it this way: I get bored during &#8216;free time&#8217; at school&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripplehelix</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/01/27/top-7-theories-why-youtube-decided-to-pay-creators-finally/#comment-3286</link>
		<dc:creator>tripplehelix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=1354#comment-3286</guid>
		<description>&quot;Revver was starting to overtake YouTube’s traffic. Kidding.&quot;

I seriously bet one day it might. If you think about it, Atom Films (pay me for the mention please) has been around for AGES and is in a higher quality to youtube and other &#039;amature&#039; viral video sites. They have gained audience through paying their &#039;creators&#039; for ages before youtube.

A site that pays creators will soon enough kick out the little people because their annoyed at getting no views and all the people who have gained millions won&#039;t be able to get enough of it.

YouTubes move icould be quite a bad one. Remember when you used to be a little tuber and had 1 or 2 subscribers and had around 0-1 view per video? What would you be thinking if one of your friends had 10k+ subscribers who refuses to mention you, wouldn&#039;t you feel really gelous(sp?). You&#039;d either leave through frustration or give up making videos.

I&#039;ve seen plenty of people gain thousands of subscribers in the time it took me to gain 10&#039;s. People cheat in this industry though various means, mostly though giving a false friendship to make you subscribe then completely disowning you. People spam just look at the Youtube Theater for example. through spam they have become &#039;big&#039;.

This is turning off topic and rather poopie, lets move on.

&quot;He’s approaching 40 million views. Do you realize how much advertising revenue that represents for YouTube? Even a couple pennies a view would have made him a millionaire.&quot;

That would actually make him a $800,000 &#039;air&#039;, In my currency that would only be around $400,000. You Americans need to fix your umm... I should know this I do business studies..... Just fix your exchange rate! Let us English folk get more cash!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Revver was starting to overtake YouTube’s traffic. Kidding.&#8221;</p>
<p>I seriously bet one day it might. If you think about it, Atom Films (pay me for the mention please) has been around for AGES and is in a higher quality to youtube and other &#8216;amature&#8217; viral video sites. They have gained audience through paying their &#8216;creators&#8217; for ages before youtube.</p>
<p>A site that pays creators will soon enough kick out the little people because their annoyed at getting no views and all the people who have gained millions won&#8217;t be able to get enough of it.</p>
<p>YouTubes move icould be quite a bad one. Remember when you used to be a little tuber and had 1 or 2 subscribers and had around 0-1 view per video? What would you be thinking if one of your friends had 10k+ subscribers who refuses to mention you, wouldn&#8217;t you feel really gelous(sp?). You&#8217;d either leave through frustration or give up making videos.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen plenty of people gain thousands of subscribers in the time it took me to gain 10&#8242;s. People cheat in this industry though various means, mostly though giving a false friendship to make you subscribe then completely disowning you. People spam just look at the Youtube Theater for example. through spam they have become &#8216;big&#8217;.</p>
<p>This is turning off topic and rather poopie, lets move on.</p>
<p>&#8220;He’s approaching 40 million views. Do you realize how much advertising revenue that represents for YouTube? Even a couple pennies a view would have made him a millionaire.&#8221;</p>
<p>That would actually make him a $800,000 &#8216;air&#8217;, In my currency that would only be around $400,000. You Americans need to fix your umm&#8230; I should know this I do business studies&#8230;.. Just fix your exchange rate! Let us English folk get more cash!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markdaycomedy</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/01/27/top-7-theories-why-youtube-decided-to-pay-creators-finally/#comment-3285</link>
		<dc:creator>markdaycomedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=1354#comment-3285</guid>
		<description>Notice that this only happened *after* YouTube recognized the &#039;Viral Video Genius&#039; and retroactively took *all of his advice*.  Huh?  Huh?  Very suspicious...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice that this only happened *after* YouTube recognized the &#8216;Viral Video Genius&#8217; and retroactively took *all of his advice*.  Huh?  Huh?  Very suspicious&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nalts</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/01/27/top-7-theories-why-youtube-decided-to-pay-creators-finally/#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>nalts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=1354#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Google buying Revver. I don&#039;t know if Revver would be on their radar, but it would be a good offensive move to stop one of the smaller sites from gaining traction in the ad-sharing space. It would be hell to integrate the technologies, but they&#039;d pick up a year of experience, smart people, relationships with media, and some patents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Google buying Revver. I don&#8217;t know if Revver would be on their radar, but it would be a good offensive move to stop one of the smaller sites from gaining traction in the ad-sharing space. It would be hell to integrate the technologies, but they&#8217;d pick up a year of experience, smart people, relationships with media, and some patents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jischinger</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/01/27/top-7-theories-why-youtube-decided-to-pay-creators-finally/#comment-3288</link>
		<dc:creator>jischinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=1354#comment-3288</guid>
		<description>When they say stuff like &quot;could soon make you rich,&quot; I hear corporate foot steps climbing the stairs. Will this turn into a Youtube Armature American Idol? And who would host such a show?

[Hands over ears]: &quot;ahh lalalalalalal ah lalalalala&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When they say stuff like &#8220;could soon make you rich,&#8221; I hear corporate foot steps climbing the stairs. Will this turn into a Youtube Armature American Idol? And who would host such a show?</p>
<p>[Hands over ears]: &#8220;ahh lalalalalalal ah lalalalala&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalisdolly</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/01/27/top-7-theories-why-youtube-decided-to-pay-creators-finally/#comment-3295</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalisdolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=1354#comment-3295</guid>
		<description>I saw a blurb about this on my local news, tonight (though I first heard of it on YouTube - duh). During the teaser, early in the broadcast, the anchorman said that posting videos on YouTube could soon make you &quot;rich&quot;. Ha. &quot;Yeah, right&quot; was the first thing to spring into my mind!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a blurb about this on my local news, tonight (though I first heard of it on YouTube &#8211; duh). During the teaser, early in the broadcast, the anchorman said that posting videos on YouTube could soon make you &#8220;rich&#8221;. Ha. &#8220;Yeah, right&#8221; was the first thing to spring into my mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Lambe</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2007/01/27/top-7-theories-why-youtube-decided-to-pay-creators-finally/#comment-3294</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Lambe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=1354#comment-3294</guid>
		<description>You forgot to add that Jason &quot;Evolution of Dance&quot; Laipply is an Australian. ;-) Comme moi. 40 million views. Astounding isn&#039;t it? Meanwhile he&#039;s driving an old clunker and eating at McDonalds, I bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot to add that Jason &#8220;Evolution of Dance&#8221; Laipply is an Australian. <img src='http://willvideoforfood.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Comme moi. 40 million views. Astounding isn&#8217;t it? Meanwhile he&#8217;s driving an old clunker and eating at McDonalds, I bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

