<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roll Over Ebert and Roeper&#8230; It&#8217;s &#8220;F%@# the Movies&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willvideoforfood.com/2006/10/31/roll-over-ebert-and-roeper-its-f-the-movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2006/10/31/roll-over-ebert-and-roeper-its-f-the-movies/</link>
	<description>Online-Video &#38; YouTube Tips for Video Creators, Marketers and Entrepeneurs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:56:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nalts</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2006/10/31/roll-over-ebert-and-roeper-its-f-the-movies/#comment-2293</link>
		<dc:creator>nalts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 23:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=1038#comment-2293</guid>
		<description>Sorry- that&#039;s one of those cases where I literally grabbed the description from the site and didn&#039;t realize it might be inferred as ME saying it was hilarious. Frankly, I found it interesting but stopped watching before any hilarious stuff happened. Will fix the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry- that&#8217;s one of those cases where I literally grabbed the description from the site and didn&#8217;t realize it might be inferred as ME saying it was hilarious. Frankly, I found it interesting but stopped watching before any hilarious stuff happened. Will fix the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2006/10/31/roll-over-ebert-and-roeper-its-f-the-movies/#comment-2294</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=1038#comment-2294</guid>
		<description>&gt; blunt, ridiculous, hilarious, profanity laced reviews

I don&#039;t know, Nalts... I&#039;ll give you 3 out 4 on the above. Not really hilarious, IMO, but it certainly had its moments. I&#039;d give &#039;em a chance, though, as I think there&#039;s some potential here. 

&gt; It’s your first recommendation that I haven’t found any merit in.

Hmmm... I don&#039;t see any mention of Kevin actually recommending it. Although he did call it hilarious, which is a stretch. But we also know that Kevin is a grown man who films himself making prank phone calls. 

Now THAT&#039;S hilarious.

j</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; blunt, ridiculous, hilarious, profanity laced reviews</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, Nalts&#8230; I&#8217;ll give you 3 out 4 on the above. Not really hilarious, IMO, but it certainly had its moments. I&#8217;d give &#8216;em a chance, though, as I think there&#8217;s some potential here. </p>
<p>&gt; It’s your first recommendation that I haven’t found any merit in.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230; I don&#8217;t see any mention of Kevin actually recommending it. Although he did call it hilarious, which is a stretch. But we also know that Kevin is a grown man who films himself making prank phone calls. </p>
<p>Now THAT&#8217;S hilarious.</p>
<p>j</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dog's Dinner</title>
		<link>http://willvideoforfood.com/2006/10/31/roll-over-ebert-and-roeper-its-f-the-movies/#comment-2295</link>
		<dc:creator>Dog's Dinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willvideoforfood.com/?p=1038#comment-2295</guid>
		<description>It was piss poor. Is there anyone still shocked that people could use the word &#039;fuck&#039; in normal discussions? This was a perfect example of bad video content. A poorly executed version of a reasonable idea. Their laissez faire attitude to reviewing movies would only be justified by a genuine respect and awe for the medium. these guys don&#039;t even bother to see the movies they&#039;re reviewing and they don&#039;t seem to care about movies at all. There&#039;s no outrage, only apathy. Very poor indeed. It&#039;s your first recommendation that I haven&#039;t found any merit in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was piss poor. Is there anyone still shocked that people could use the word &#8216;fuck&#8217; in normal discussions? This was a perfect example of bad video content. A poorly executed version of a reasonable idea. Their laissez faire attitude to reviewing movies would only be justified by a genuine respect and awe for the medium. these guys don&#8217;t even bother to see the movies they&#8217;re reviewing and they don&#8217;t seem to care about movies at all. There&#8217;s no outrage, only apathy. Very poor indeed. It&#8217;s your first recommendation that I haven&#8217;t found any merit in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

